DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES OF STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC ANALYSES OF UZBEK AND ENGLISH NEOLOGISMS

Authors

  • Odilova Gulzira Muhiddin qizi Master’s degree, NamSU

Keywords:

globalization, technology, influence, neologism

Abstract

There exist various definitions of such a linguistic notion, as neologism, and every of them expresses the gist of this notion taking into the consideration one of the numerous aspects of neologism. The most general are: «Neologism: Neologisms are «words that have appeared in a language in connection with new phenomena, new concepts, but which have not yet entered into the active vocabularies of a significant portion of the native speakers of the language». The common thing in these both definitions is that neologism is not yet registered in dictionaries and in most cases, it is a colloquialism for the time being. If we consider the cultural acceptance, we can reckon that after being coined, neologisms invariably undergo scrutiny by the public and by linguists to determine their suitability to the language.

References

Spears Richard A. NTC’s Dictionary of American Slang and colloquial expressions. NTC Publishing Group Lincolnwood, Illinois, USA. 2001. p. 126

Uzbekistan Today. A decree “On measures to further improve foreign language learning system”. Newspaper Т. 2012. December 11th. pp.2-45

Kukharenko V. A. A Book of Practice in Stylistics. M. Высшая школа, 1987 p.83

Chapman R. L. American Slang. Harber and Row, Publishers. N.Y. 1987.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-08

How to Cite

Odilova Gulzira Muhiddin qizi. (2023). DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES OF STRUCTURAL-SEMANTIC ANALYSES OF UZBEK AND ENGLISH NEOLOGISMS. MODERN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM AND INNOVATIVE TEACHING SOLUTIONS, 6(6), 61–62. Retrieved from https://esiconf.com/index.php/mes/article/view/354